How to date a fossil using radiometric dating
Interestingly, even some young-earth creationists accept these dates and reason that dinosaurs could never have existed because their bones are dated to before the creation of the world.
Children's books, schools, and television programs have so firmly connected dinosaur bones and other fossils with a multimillion-year history that the two are practically inseparable in today's culture.
If the answer is a) or b) I would say this would perhaps support the evolutionary model.
If radiometric dating was truly unreliable then it is unlikely it would be able to consistently date fossils to the same era of absolute time.
What I mean is if the fossils were really approximately the same age (as in the creation flood model) then there should not be an upward progression of rock ages as we move 'up' the geologic column- as almost the entire geologic column should be roughly the same age.
As the dating methods are supposed to be unreliable, and are simply dating rocks all from roughly the same time, shouldn't we expect a more random distribution of rock ages and certainly not an upward progression??
The only scenario in which this is possible (the way I currently see it) is c).
Search for how to date a fossil using radiometric dating:
The ages assigned to fossils by paleontologists are frequently stated as matter-of-fact in news reports with little to no explanation of how they were obtained.